If you have been wondering what apps are out there, then you’ve come to the right place. Seeing that we basically do all our communication on the go a professional having a hand-held scanner could be extremely useful to instantly scan and send documents to clients and colleagues instantaneously, at the quality of a professional duplex machine that takes up as much as an entire desk in an office. Because of its high-quality camera, some developers quickly vision how your phone could become a pocket scanner. The phone is now more a tool than a communication device. It’s amazing what developers have been able to create over the 9 years of the App Stores life and we know there’s no stopping with the rate technology grows each day. The iPhone probably being the most popular phone becomes so powerful when you discover some of the amazing apps available to download from its densely populated App Store. I can't explain these results but I'm pretty confident that the conclusion is correct.Nowadays your smartphone is closer to replacing just about every device you’ve learned to love over the past years. However, if you plan on optimizing your files with Acrobat (to reduce size) you will get a better quality output if the OCR'g was done with snapscan. The conclusion: In terms of how long it takes, quality of output or ultimate file size there is no difference between OCR'g with snapscan or with Acrobat. As expected, before the optimization was done all documents looked identical regardless of whether they were OCR'd by snapscan or Acrobat. Once again, I should mention that all of the documents were "optimized" with Acrobat. For some reason, the snapscan OCR'd material looked much better than the Acrobat OCR's material. However, there was a noticeable difference in the quality of the scans. It's not surprising that in all the scans there was not a very significant difference in the size of the files ie: scapscan OCR'g or Acrobat OCR'g produces the same size files. In every case I optimized the final document with Acrobat to reduce file sizes. The only thing that I varied was whether snapscan would do the OCR or whether Acrobat would do it. I carried out the following experiment: I scanned 3 different 20 page documents using the same settings in every case (automatic resolution,B&W, duplex). I've recently been scanning fairly large amounts of data into EN and have been playing a bit with the settings. I know that this topic has been hammered to death in various places in the forum but it may still have some relevance.
0 kommentar(er)
